Deliverable 01
An Opportunity Assessment report.
One document, ready for the board. Sector context, current-state summary, ranked opportunity register, technology recommendations, sequenced roadmap, ROI headline.
S0 · Advise
A structured discovery engagement — 8 stages, ranked opportunities, ROI-costed roadmap — delivered by our partner practice so we walk into your build with the shape already agreed.
This service is delivered by our partner practice — the Automation & AI Consultancy — and led by Clark Coleman. The positioning is deliberately tool-neutral: the assessment recommends the right technology for each opportunity, whether that’s RPA, workflow automation, an LLM integration, an agentic system, or a plain process redesign. Sometimes the honest recommendation is that AI is not yet the right tool.
Engagements typically hand off to Axonomic Labs for the build tier when a client wants to execute the roadmap — but the assessment can stand alone. If the honest recommendation is that you don’t need us for the next stage, we’ll say so.
Read the partnership positioning in docs/20-, or ask on a call.
For a concrete feel of the kinds of patterns an assessment typically surfaces, the demos library walks through three of them end-to-end — invoice processing, month-end reporting, and contract review. Every recommendation the assessment makes is grounded in something we could actually build.
When to bring us in
How we approach it
A short business overview — commercial context, the P&L lines that matter, existing platform choices, compliance posture, appetite for change. The interesting recommendations live in the constraints; we start by writing them down.
Structured departmental interviews across Finance, Operations, HR, Legal, Procurement, Risk, IT, Customer Service — wherever automation earns money or reduces risk. Process inventories, pain-point signalling, capability baselining.
Every candidate use case scored on Value, Feasibility, Speed, and Strategic Alignment. Weightings are transparent and defendable; the ranking survives contact with a board room.
For the top-ranked opportunities, an outline architecture with the technology choice justified — automation platform, LLM, agentic orchestrator, process redesign, or the honest recommendation to do nothing yet.
Quick wins (under 30 days), medium horizon (1–6 months), strategic (6 months+). Sequenced for compounding capability, not for optics. Every horizon has an ROI-costed business case attached.
What you get
Deliverable 01
One document, ready for the board. Sector context, current-state summary, ranked opportunity register, technology recommendations, sequenced roadmap, ROI headline.
Deliverable 02
The processes, tooling, KPIs, and automation candidates we found in every function we assessed. Yours to keep — the reference you'll wish you'd had at the start of Year One.
Deliverable 03
For every recommended intervention, a written justification of the technology choice — RPA vs. agents vs. LLM vs. redesign — with cost, duration, maintenance, and risk bands.
Engagement models
SPRINT
Four to six weeks. One assessor, weekly working session with the sponsor. Delivered as a document, not a deck.
DEPT
Two weeks per department for organisations that want to sequence the assessment. Process reviews, opportunity register, deliverable report per function.
Related services
S2 · Build
Multi-step LLM workflows with clean topology, tool surfaces, memory, evaluation, and safety — built to land in production, not stall in a demo.
S5 · Advise
A senior architect embedded with your programme — end-to-end design, build-vs-buy calls, vendor evaluation, technical risk review.
S6 · Advise
Leadership-level direction — opportunity portfolio, operating model, board-ready narrative — grounded in what's actually buildable today.
A 30-minute discovery call. We'll get to the shape of the work and whether we're the right fit.